Regarding this margin queston I'd like to bring the issue up of just how margins are calculated.
It seems that different shops have different opinions on what exactly constitutes a profit margin.
For example over in screenprinters.net it was mentioned a while ago about how someone (and I won't mention the user) was in at roughly 48% margin.
And a couple other guys went on to say this was INCREDIBLE since on a good month they'd get 20-30% . It had the air of "i don't believe you" but it was merely implied rather than stated. I went on to argue that the guy in question was probably NOT PAYING HIMSELF, and not taking into account how many true man hours go into a job, and then having a base man-hour cost. The guy never completely answered and only said "all that matters is what you can get a product for , and what you can sell it for"
Ok so clearly there are some issues here.
In order for us to all communicate better and help eachother reach the next level, it is best if we are all on the same page.
I believe the simplest way but CORRECT way for determing profit margin is to factor in total cost of goods (including shipping/spoilage/insurance/supplies etc).
This would be RAW GOODS cost. Then there would be labor expressed in man-hours. Total labor for a job includes all customer service, art work, setups, tear down, printing, folding/boxing, invoicing, and delivery. Basically the idea is how many man hours did it take for a job to get done and for you to return to back to normal (i.e 5 coated screens ready to go, returned to 5 coated screens ready to go). Ok NOW , once we have an estimated man hour time for the job, we tack on a price to that - 40 bucks an hour or what not. Finally, we figure in some electrical/water costs based on manhours. For example 1 hour of print time means one hour of dryer/flash usage. Etc.
Now keep in mind i am no expert, and im not some pretentious college jerk that took a business course. So I may not have all the fact, nor use all the correct terms. These are just my experience and logical conclusions. SUrely their may be more costs I have missed, which is why i noted it was the "simple" way.
The thing is I see home shops completely tear out the man hours involved with the thinking that since they do it themselves its not a cost. Additionally they may also think, since I DON'T PAY MYSELF, its not a cost. But from a scientific standpoint, it still is a cost that would benefit you in including for the sake of the effectiveness of the equation. So even if you don't pay yourself, even if you don't have man-hour calculation, it would BENEFIT you to include these things because you could key in more on how much you are REALLY making ?
Above all , it would put us all on the same page, and all more able to understand and help eachother.
Going on that, I think most shops with commercial location average 20% ? Which even homade shops should average IF they included man-hours into their equation. Your time is a cost no matter if you pay yourslef or not , still good to know right?
Any thoughts on this is appreciated.
Thanks for reading this far!